Privacy of Real-Time Communications [Phone Calls, etc.]

Administrator
Site Admin
Posts: 11757
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 4:15 am

Privacy of Real-Time Communications [Phone Calls, etc.]

Postby Administrator » Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:56 pm

Privacy of Real-Time Communications [Phone Calls, etc.]

Subject to enumerated exceptions, it is illegal in the United States to intercept the contents of wire, oral, or electronic communications or to disclose the contents of a communication that one knows to have been illegally intercepted. 18 U.S.C. 2511. Oral communications are protected whenever the speaker exhibits a reasonable expectation of privacy. Wire communications are defined as conversations that travel in whole or in part by wire and are understandable to the human ear. Electronic communications are defined as any other transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectronic, or photo-optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce. Thus, the protection for electronic communications covers faxes and other types of data transfers.


The most frequently used exceptions allow communications to be intercepted by: (1) a law enforcement officer if acting pursuant to a court order; 18 U.S.C. 2518(c), (2) any person, if at least one party to the communication gives consent; 18 U.S.C. 2511(c ),(d), (3) an employer, when acting in the ordinary course of its business;18 U.S.C. 2510(5)(a), and (4) a service provider when the provider is monitoring wire or electronic communications in the normal course of business as a necessary incident to the rendition of service or to protect the rights or property of the provider.18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(a)(I).


Individuals now use e-mail as frequently as the telephone, but the distinction between wire and electronic communications retains legal significance. First, voice communications may only be intercepted pursuant to a court order in connection with the suspected commission of certain designated offenses. By contrast, electronic communications may be intercepted in connection with the suspected commission of any federal felony. Second, electronic communications are not covered by the statutory exclusionary rule, which otherwise prohibits the use of communications unlawfully intercepted in any judicial, legislative, or regulatory proceeding. 18 U.S.C. 2515 (1994).
David A. Szwak
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak, LLC
416 Travis Street, Suite 1404, Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-424-1400 / Fax 221-6555
President, Bossier Little League
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association

Return to “Invasion of Privacy: State Law”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest