21 Q Okay. And I wanted to make sure that you
22 had heard the whole question because the question
23 is, is that a -- whether a data file is a
24 compilation of information that's brought under
1 certain indicative information in the form of a
3 A I'm sorry. Can you repeat that?
4 Q Well, let me ask you. What is indicative
6 A I use the term "indicative information" to
7 refer to the consumer's name, address, Social
8 Security number, date of birth.
9 Q Is it accurate to say that data files exist
10 in TransUnion's CRONUS system and are separated by
11 the indicative information that is reported in
12 connection with a certain pool of data?
13 A I'm not -- I'm sorry. I'm not sure I'm
14 following what you're asking.
15 Q Well, let me ask you. How are different
16 data files separated in the TransUnion CRONUS
18 A The files exist individually within the
19 CRONUS database.
20 Q How are they separated? How do you
21 determine when certain pieces of information should
22 be joined together to form a particular data file
23 and when they should not?
24 A The information is all contained together
1 as a single record.
2 Q Globally?
3 A I'm sorry. I'm not sure I understand what
4 you mean.
5 Q What I'm asking you is . . . (sic) place
6 that information into the same data file?
7 MR. CENTO: David, we're -- we're not
8 hearing you.
9 THE WITNESS: It's cutting out, I think,
10 when --
11 MR. CENTO: You're cutting out --
12 THE WITNESS: -- trains are going by.
13 MR. CENTO: And I don't know. Could you
14 repeat what you just said. We didn't get any of
16 MR. Szwak: Okay. Madam Court Reporter,
17 can you hear me okay?
18 THE COURT REPORTER: Well, there was just a
19 pause. There was nothing. The train was going
20 by, and we didn't hear -- we heard the end of
21 it, like four words.
22 MR. Szwak: I was wondering what that loud
23 humming was. The train.
24 MR. CENTO: You got it.
1 BY MR. Szwak:
2 Q What I want to ask you, Ms. Romanowski, is,
3 when information is being reported under
4 TransUnion's CRONUS database system, is it true that
5 TransUnion will place information into certain data
6 files depending upon the indicative information
7 reported with that item?
8 A I'm sorry. I'm not understanding -- I'm
9 not following what you're saying.
10 Q Well, let me ask you to explain to me, how
11 is it that information comes to be in different data
13 A Information is reported to TransUnion. And
14 then based upon a series of different rules, the
15 information is applied to a consumer's file on the
17 Q Do those rules pertain to the indicative
18 information reported in connection with the item?
19 A Yes, I believe they do.
20 Q Well, in essence, if there are a lot
21 of different people with the name Wendy Porter
22 (sic) . . .
23 THE COURT REPORTER: We cannot hear you.
24 MR. CENTO: David, we can't hear you.
2 MR. Szwak: Yes. I was waiting for the
3 train to pass.
4 MR. CENTO: Oh.
5 BY MR. Szwak:
6 Q If there are multiple reports coming into
7 TransUnion of account information pertaining to, for
8 example, Wendy Porter --
9 A I'm sorry. "If there are multiple" -- can
10 you repeat that again? "If there are multiple
12 Q Right. You're familiar with the fact that
13 you may have a number of subscribers reporting
14 account information about a person, one or more
15 persons named Wendy Porter, right?
16 A Yes.
17 Q I mean, there's lots of Wendy Porters in
18 the United States presumably, right?
19 A There may be.
20 Q And each of those persons would have
21 different addresses and different Social Security
22 numbers presumably, right?
23 A Yes.
24 Q And they would have different dates of
1 birth, right?
2 A Possibly, yes.
3 Q Quite possibly. But based upon the
4 personal identification information that is attached
5 to a specific account, that is how TransUnion
6 determines whether to place that information
7 together with other pre-existing information, right?
8 A Yes.
9 Q Now, there's a set of business rules that
10 determine how data is placed into pre-existing data
11 files in the CRONUS system, right?
12 A Yes.
13 Q Or in some cases a new credit file might be
14 created, say, if there's no pre-existing information
15 about that particular consumer, right?
16 A Yes.
17 Q Now, in this case were you able to identify
18 more than one data file that was being brought
19 together and -- and being compiled for the purpose
20 of producing a report in response to an inquiry
21 about the plaintiff?
22 MR. CENTO: Object to the form.
23 A Are you asking if -- again, I'm -- I'm
24 sorry. I'm not following what you're saying.
1 BY MR. Szwak:
2 Q Ms. Romanowski, this -- you -- you are in
3 charge of writing business rules for TransUnion?
4 A Yes.
5 Q Okay. You understand that -- that there
6 are multiple data files that will exist in
7 TransUnion's system that might have the name Wendy
8 Porter, right?
9 A Yes.
10 Q And there might be more than one Wendy
11 Porter in the state of Michigan, correct?
12 A Yes.
13 Q And there might even be more than one Wendy
14 Porter that lives in the same ZIP Code as the
15 plaintiff in this case, correct?
16 A It's possible, yes.
17 Q Did you find any other data files in your
18 review of the records that have been presented to
19 you that show a second data file coming together
20 with the data file of the plaintiff in order to
21 produce a report?
22 A There was a second data file that was
23 reported, but it didn't -- when you say come
24 together, I'm understanding that as combining. And
1 they did not combine. They were reported as
2 separate files.
3 Q Okay. Now, you -- you've indicated that
4 there's a second data file. Let's first identify
5 that data file. Is that the William Porter file
6 that is shown on Exhibit No. 3, actually beginning
7 on Exhibit No. 2, going onto Exhibit No. 3?
8 A There's a William Porter file on Exhibit
9 No. 3.
10 Q Okay. And is that the data file that
11 you're referring to?
12 A Yes.
13 Q Now, when you reviewed that particular data
14 file on William Porter, does it have a different
15 "infile" date than the file on Wendy Porter?
16 A Yes, it does.
17 Q Now, when you review Exhibits 2 and 3
18 together -- and I'll represent to you we've
19 identified that as a subscriber version credit
20 report that was issued to Brighton Ford on the date
21 that's referenced, being November 30th, 2000 -- does
22 that appear to be -- I mean, assuming it was issued
23 to Brighton Ford, does that appear to be a
24 subscriber version format?
1 A Yes, it does.
2 Q Now, when you review the inquiries that are
3 listed in connection with each of those data files,
4 meaning the Wendy Porter file and the William Porter
5 file, did you find consistencies between the
6 inquiries that are posted?
7 A Yes. There are inquiries that are in
8 common between the two files.
9 Q Would it be fair to say that, when these
10 inquiries were being made by these particular
11 subscribers, that TransUnion was producing to those
12 subscribers a report which contained both of the
13 data files, the Wendy Porter data file and the
14 William Porter data file?
15 MR. CENTO: Objection, lack of foundation.
16 A Not necessarily.
17 BY MR. Szwak:
18 Q Do you know that to be a fact or not?
19 A I'm sorry. For what to be a fact?
20 Q That the two files were either being
21 produced or were not being produced.
22 A Each of the files were produced, but I
23 don't know that they were necessarily produced in
24 response to the same inquiry.
1 Q You believe that there would have been one
2 inquiry made on each of those days in the name of
3 Wendy Porter and then a second inquiry for the name
4 William Porter?
5 A It's possible. I don't know what the
6 inquiry input information is.
7 Q Define the inquiry input information or
8 what we call the terminal audit trail.
9 A I -- I'm not familiar with the term
10 "terminal audit trail," but inquiry input
11 information is the information that's supplied to
12 TransUnion that -- on behalf of the consumer, the
13 consumer's name, address, Social Security number,
14 date of birth.
15 Q Now, when a subscriber makes an inquiry,
16 they're not necessarily required to input complete
17 consumer identification; is that true?
18 MR. CENTO: Objection to form.
19 A They're required to input the consumer's
20 first name, last name, and current address.
21 BY MR. Szwak:
22 Q Okay. Can they make an inquiry without
23 putting the consumer's address in?
24 A No.
Father-Son, Mother-Daughter, Junior-Senior-Trey [Generational Designators], Common Names, Variations on Social Security Numbers and Other Mixed File Issues
- General Discussions, Forum Registration, and ID Theft and Credit-Related News Stories
- General Discussion
- News Stories on Identity Theft, Personal Data Thefts and Credit Reporting Abuses
- Current Cases
- Lawyer Jokes
- FCRA Statute and Defined Terms Under the FCRA
- FCRA Statute And Amendments: 15 U.S.C. 1681, et. seq.
- What is a Consumer [Credit] Reporting Agency?
- What is a Consumer [Credit] Report?
- Resellers: Who are They? What Do They Do? Are They Liable Under the FCRA?
- Investigative Consumer [Credit] Reports
- Who is a Furnisher?
- How to Get Your Credit Reports and How and Who to Write Your Dispute Letters to
- How To Get Your Credit Reports
- Dispute Letters
- Do You Have To Pay For Your Credit Report?
- FCRA Private Rights of Action and Duties Imposed by the FCRA
- Impermissible Access: 15 U.S.C. 1681b[f] and 1681q
- Front End Duties of the Credit Reporting Agencies: 15 U.S.C. 1681e(b)
- Back End Duties of the CRAs: 1681i[a]:
- Credit Bureau's Duty to Provide Consumer Documentation to Furnisher: 1681i[a][B]
- Duty to Add a Consumer's Dispute Statement in Association with a Specific Account and In Connection with the Credit File/Report: 15 U.S.C. 1681i[c]
- Furnisher FCRA Liability: 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2
- Failing to Mark Contested Accounts As Disputed: 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2[a]
- Obsolescence: When Must the Credit Reportings Come Off of the Credit Report: 15 U.S.C. 1681c
- Duty to Notate Disputed Accounts As Such: 15 U.S.C. 1681c[f]
- Adverse Action Notice Rules: 15 U.S.C. 1681m and ECOA
- Credit Solicitations Are Required to be Clear and Conspicuous: 1681m[d]
- Potential Exposure For Sanctions Due to Filing Bad Faith FCRA Cases: 15 U.S.C. 1681n[c], 28 U.S.C. 1927, and Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 11
- Credit Repair Organizations Act [CROA]
- 1681g: Credit Bureaus' Duties to Provide Reports/Disclosures and to Add 100 Word Statements of the Consumer
- Affiliate Sharing Problems and Violations, 15 U.S.C. 1681s-3
- Common Credit Report Errors and Agency Misconduct
- Credit Errors
- Theft of Identity
- Mixed File Cases
- Re-Aging: Debt Collector's Efforts to Revive Obsolete Reportings
- Reinsertion of Previously Deleted Data: How and When Can It Happen?
- VIP Databases and Offline Status
- Deceased Reporting Cases
- Causation: The Crucial Link Between Breach of a Duty and Damages
- Causation to Damage [Proving Your Damages Are Related to and Caused by the Defendants
- Types of Damages, Remedies, and Awards Under the FCRA and Related State Law Claims
- Damages Under FCRA
- Punitive Damages: 15 U.S.C. 1681n
- Injunctive Relief: FCRA and State Law
- Attorneys' Fees, Litigation Expenses and Costs:
- Declaratory Relief Under the FCRA
- What is Your Potential Case Worth? Other Case Verdicts, etc.
- FCRA Jury and Bench Trial Verdicts
- Other Federal Laws Related to Credit Reporting, Data Privacy, Billing Errors and ID Theft
- FDCPA Statute And Amendments: 15 U.S.C. 1692, et. seq.
- Fair Credit Billing Act, 15 U.S.C. 1666, et. seq.
- Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998, 18 U.S.C. §1028
- Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”) and Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (“HAFA”)
- State Law Claims Related to Credit Reporting, Billing Errors, Privacy Breaches and ID Theft
- Invasion of Privacy: State Law
- Defamation: State Law
- Interference With Prospective Credit: State Law
- Interference With Marital/Family Relations: State Law
- Infliction of Emotional Distress/Mental Anguish: State Law
- Data Breach Claims and Issues
- Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Claims: State Law
- Jurisdiction, Venue, Removal to Federal Court, Remand to State Court, and Other Pre-Trial Jurisdicti
- Removal of FCRA Cases From State Court To Federal Court
- Personal Jurisdiction and Venue in Credit Reporting Cases
- FCRA Litigation Strategies and Procedural Issues and Law
- Settlements, Releases, Prevailing Party Status, and Other Things You Need to Know If You Resolve Your Case Before Judgment
- Offers of Judgment In FCRA Litigation
- Secret Documents, Product Information and Testimony
- Choicepoint Secret Documents:
- Equifax/CSC and Affiliates Secret Documents:
- Experian Secret Documents
- Innovis Secret Documents:
- Trans Union Secret Documents
- Furnisher and Public Records Suppliers Secret Documents
- Respondeat Superior, Vicarious Liability, and Whether Others Are Liable
- Liability For Employee's FCRA Violations? Liability For FCRA Violations by Third Parties?
- FCRA Preemption, Immunity, and Qualified Immunity
- FCRA Preemption: 15 U.S.C. 1681t[b][F] and Related Discussions
- FCRA Qualified Immunity: 15 U.S.C. 1681h[e] and Related Discussions
- States/Govermental Immunity From FCRA Claims?
- Jury Voir Dire, Instructions, Verdict Forms, etc.
- Jury Instructions and Jury Verdict Forms
- Jury Questionnaires, Voir Dire, Jury Selection and Jury Bias
- Credit Card Issues
- Credit Card Liabilities
- Do You Have a Right to Bring Claims and How Long Do You Have?
- Statute Of Limitation: 15 U.S.C. 1681p
- Standing to Sue
- Credit Scores, Adverse Action Codes, and Other Report Codes
- Credit Scores, Adverse Action Codes, Risk Factors, Denial Codes and Other Scores and Codes Supplied by the Credit Reporting Agencies
- The Mechanics of Credit Reporting
- Public Records Reportings [Non-Bankruptcy]
- Bankruptcy Reporting
- Student Loan Credit Reporting
- Metro Tape [I and II]: Standardized Credit Reporting Formats Used by the Credit Industry
- Defenses Asserted by Credit Reporting Defendants
- What Law Applies? Problems Barring Use of the Court and Law
- Arbitration, Forum Selection, Choice of Law, Choice of Venue and Other Adhesionary Clauses
- Conflicts of Laws Issues in FCRA and Related State Law Issues
- Standing and Statutes of Limitations
- Statute Of Limitation: 15 U.S.C. 1681p
- FCRA Legal Forms [Suits, Discovery, etc.]
- Discovery: Interrogatories, Requests For Production of Documents, Requests to Inspect, Requests For Admissions, Deposition Notices, Subpoenas, Deposit
- FCRA Sample Pleadings: Complaints, Motions, Oppositions and Other Standard Lawsuit Filings
- Defenses Frequently Asserted by Defendants to Consumer's Actions
- FCRA Class Actions and Class Issues
- FCRA Class Actions
- Special Evidentiary Issues: What is Evidence?
- Evidentiary Issues in FCRA Cases
- Expert Witnesses, Special Issues and Daubert and Related Challenges
- Appellate Issues, Rules, Law, Etc.
- Defenses Asserted by Industry and Abuse Stories
- Defense Counsel Abuses and War Stories
- Law Outlines: Various Topics
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests