Higher Security Deposit is "Damage"

David A. Szwak

Higher Security Deposit is "Damage"

Postby David A. Szwak » Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:24 pm

Consumer who initiates transaction or applies for service with wireless provider, and who is required to pay higher security deposit due to something negative in credit history, has suffered an "adverse action" under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
Baynes v. ALLTEL Wireless of Alabama, Inc.,
322 F.Supp.2d 1307, M.D.Ala., Jun 01, 2004

Return to “Damages Under FCRA”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests