1 post • Page 1 of 1
Voir dire. French for "to speak the truth." Some states pronounce it vor [as in "for"] dire, long i; vawaw dear in others. The questioning of prospective jurors by a judge and attorneys in court. Voir dire is used to determine if any juror is biased and/or cannot deal with the issues fairly, or if there is cause not to allow a juror to serve [knowledge of the facts; acquaintanceship with parties, witnesses or attorneys; occupation which might lead to bias; prejudice against the death penalty; or previous experiences such as having been sued in a similar case]. Actually one of the unspoken purposes of the voir dire is for the attorneys to get a feel for the personalities and likely views of the people on the jury panel. In some courts [usually federal civil, some state criminal courts], the judge asks most of the questions, while in others [First JDC, civil] the lawyers are given substantial latitude and time to ask questions. Some jurors may be dismissed for cause by the judge, and the attorneys may excuse others in "peremptory" challenges without stating any reason. 2] questions asked to determine the competence of an alleged expert witness. 3] any hearing outside the presence of the jury held during trial.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest