Reasonableness is a Question of Fact For the Jury

Maximum Possible Accuracy
David A. Szwak

Reasonableness is a Question of Fact For the Jury

Postby David A. Szwak » Thu Oct 27, 2005 5:48 pm

All courts are consistent in holding that “reasonableness” is a question of fact reserved solely unto the jury. Guimond v. Trans Union, 45 F.3d, at 1333 [9th Cir.] ["The reasonableness of the procedures and whether the agency followed them will be jury questions in the overwhelming majority of cases."]; Andrews v. TRW Inc., 225 F.3d 1063, 1068 [9th Cir. 2000] reversed on other grounds, TRW v. Andrews, 534 U.S. 19, 151 L.Ed.2d 339, 122 S.Ct. 441, 447 [2001]; Dalton v. Capital Associated Industries, Inc., 257 F.3d 409 [4th Cir. 2001]; Mathews v. GEICO, 23 F.Supp.2d at 1164; Thomas v. Trans Union, LLC, 197 F.Supp.2d 1233 [U.S.D.C. Ore. 2002]; Crabill v. Trans Union, 259 F.3d 662, 664 [7th Cir. 2001]; Olwell v. Medical Info. Bureau, 2003 U.S.Dist.Lexis 442 [U.S.D.C Minn. 2003]; Thomas v. Trans Union, L.L.C., 197 F.Supp.2d 1233, 1237 [U.S.D.C. Or. 2002]; Batdorf v. Trans Union, 2002 U.S.Dist.Lexis 9489 [U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. 2002]; Obabueki v. IBM, 145 F.Supp.2d 371, 379 [U.S.D.C. S.D. N.Y. 2001]; Cotto v. Jenney, 721 F.Supp. 5 [U.S.D.C. Mass. 1989].

David A. Szwak

Postby David A. Szwak » Sat Nov 05, 2005 7:23 am

Robinson v. Equifax Information Services, LLC.,
Slip Copy, 2005 WL 1712479, S.D.Ala., Jul 22, 2005

Shah v. Collecto, Inc.,
Slip Copy, 2005 WL 2216242, D.Md., Sep 12, 2005

Swanson v. Central Bank & Trust Co.,
Slip Copy, 2005 WL 1719363, E.D.Ky., Jul 14, 2005

Feldman v. Comprehensive Information Services, Inc.,
Not Reported in A.2d, 2003 WL 22413484, 35 Conn. L. Rptr. 683, Conn.Super., Oct 06, 2003

Soghomonian v. U.S.,
278 F.Supp.2d 1151, 92 A.F.T.R.2d 2003-5919, E.D.Cal., Jul 29, 2003


Return to “Front End Duties of the Credit Reporting Agencies: 15 U.S.C. 1681e(b)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests