A F F I D A V I T
STATE OF LOUISIANA
PARISH OF CADDO
BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary Public, personally came and appeared David A. Szwak, a major domiciliary of Bossier City, Bossier Parish, Louisiana, who after being duly sworn did depose and state, upon personal knowledge, as follows:
* That he is an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana. That he has testified by report and/or deposition and/or affidavit in a large number of Fair Credit Reporting Act cases, many of which involved Trans Union, LLC f/k/a Trans Union Corp. [“Trans Union”], a national credit reporting agency. That he has handled, as lead counsel and consulting or secondary counsel, hundreds of cases involving Trans Union as a defendant.
* That he is very familiar with Trans Union’s credit reporting system and archived records due to disclosures made by Trans Union in discovery in litigation. That in numerous cases, Trans Union has voluntarily produced “name scans” which are the only known source of information regarding the state of each credit file in the credit reporting database. That scans are essentially snapshots taken at specified points in time. That the snapshots or “name scans” at taken of each separate data file [grouping or collection of data] existing in the system as of each specific date. That name scans can be used to restore part or all of the credit reporting database and can also be used for research purposes, i.e., to determine how one or more data files appeared during a specific time frame. That data washes into and out of the data files over time so name scans are crucial to determine the content of a specific data file at the specific point in time. That separate data file [data grouping] are compared and culled and the residual files are selected for inclusion in a consumer credit report depending upon the identifiers in the specific data file when compared to the identifiers inputted in the inquiry format data fields. That it is not uncommon to find that numerous data files may relate to the same consumer. That it is also not uncommon that deficiencies in the matching algorithm employed by Trans Union will cause files and data not pertaining to the same consumer or identifiers.
* That name scans are a necessary record in evaluating the state of the credit reporting system historically. That successive scans shows how and when data files come into existence in Trans Union’s system. That the scans show when data files merge or combine. That the scans show the content of the respective files in time periods. That Trans Union has claimed not to archive copies of credit reports upon individual subscriber/user inquiries. That the scans are critical in determining what data appeared in credit reports published by Trans Union to third parties-users when the third party no longer maintains a copy of the reports. That credit report content can be determined from the scans.
* That it is critical to obtain all of the parallel name scans existing in the system. That data files are created and exist in parallel due to differences in the identification data reported in connection with the data reported and placed into the file. That over time, files may be combined with other existing and parallel files depending on the identification data associated with the file. That it is very important to insure that Trans Union produces all of the successive, parallel scans archived and which pertain to the credit reports published upon inquiry about the plaintiff. That despite the creation of a credit report containing multiple data files in the single report, those files may not necessary thereafter be combined or merged together and may continue to exist in parallel and continue to come together with some or all of the same separate files to form a credit report.
* That the name scans do not contain any type of trade secret or proprietary logic or codes and cannot be used to “reverse engineer the match logic or access the system. That name scans are easily and routinely generated and produced in litigation and for research purposes at Trans Union. That the cost to generate the name scans is minimal. That Trans Union has routinely produced the name scans in cases with and without a protective order in place. That the protective order issue has never been used to address name scans but is used to address disclosure of the actual match logic when needed. That name scans are ordinary business records of Trans Union and merely constitute a snapshot of the data contained in a data file on a certain date and time.
David A. Szwak
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME this the ____ day of __________________________, 2005.
Maximum Possible Accuracy
Postby David A. Szwak » Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:01 am
- General Discussions, Forum Registration, and ID Theft and Credit-Related News Stories
- General Discussion
- News Stories on Identity Theft, Personal Data Thefts and Credit Reporting Abuses
- Current Cases
- Lawyer Jokes
- FCRA Statute and Defined Terms Under the FCRA
- FCRA Statute And Amendments: 15 U.S.C. 1681, et. seq.
- What is a Consumer [Credit] Reporting Agency?
- What is a Consumer [Credit] Report?
- Resellers: Who are They? What Do They Do? Are They Liable Under the FCRA?
- Investigative Consumer [Credit] Reports
- Who is a Furnisher?
- How to Get Your Credit Reports and How and Who to Write Your Dispute Letters to
- How To Get Your Credit Reports
- Dispute Letters
- Do You Have To Pay For Your Credit Report?
- FCRA Private Rights of Action and Duties Imposed by the FCRA
- Impermissible Access: 15 U.S.C. 1681b[f] and 1681q
- Front End Duties of the Credit Reporting Agencies: 15 U.S.C. 1681e(b)
- Back End Duties of the CRAs: 1681i[a]:
- Credit Bureau's Duty to Provide Consumer Documentation to Furnisher: 1681i[a][B]
- Duty to Add a Consumer's Dispute Statement in Association with a Specific Account and In Connection with the Credit File/Report: 15 U.S.C. 1681i[c]
- Furnisher FCRA Liability: 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2
- Failing to Mark Contested Accounts As Disputed: 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2[a]
- Obsolescence: When Must the Credit Reportings Come Off of the Credit Report: 15 U.S.C. 1681c
- Duty to Notate Disputed Accounts As Such: 15 U.S.C. 1681c[f]
- Adverse Action Notice Rules: 15 U.S.C. 1681m and ECOA
- Credit Solicitations Are Required to be Clear and Conspicuous: 1681m[d]
- Potential Exposure For Sanctions Due to Filing Bad Faith FCRA Cases: 15 U.S.C. 1681n[c], 28 U.S.C. 1927, and Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 11
- Credit Repair Organizations Act [CROA]
- 1681g: Credit Bureaus' Duties to Provide Reports/Disclosures and to Add 100 Word Statements of the Consumer
- Affiliate Sharing Problems and Violations, 15 U.S.C. 1681s-3
- Common Credit Report Errors and Agency Misconduct
- Credit Errors
- Theft of Identity
- Mixed File Cases
- Re-Aging: Debt Collector's Efforts to Revive Obsolete Reportings
- Reinsertion of Previously Deleted Data: How and When Can It Happen?
- VIP Databases and Offline Status
- Deceased Reporting Cases
- Causation: The Crucial Link Between Breach of a Duty and Damages
- Causation to Damage [Proving Your Damages Are Related to and Caused by the Defendants
- Types of Damages, Remedies, and Awards Under the FCRA and Related State Law Claims
- Damages Under FCRA
- Punitive Damages: 15 U.S.C. 1681n
- Injunctive Relief: FCRA and State Law
- Attorneys' Fees, Litigation Expenses and Costs:
- Declaratory Relief Under the FCRA
- What is Your Potential Case Worth? Other Case Verdicts, etc.
- FCRA Jury and Bench Trial Verdicts
- Other Federal Laws Related to Credit Reporting, Data Privacy, Billing Errors and ID Theft
- FDCPA Statute And Amendments: 15 U.S.C. 1692, et. seq.
- Fair Credit Billing Act, 15 U.S.C. 1666, et. seq.
- Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998, 18 U.S.C. §1028
- Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”) and Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (“HAFA”)
- State Law Claims Related to Credit Reporting, Billing Errors, Privacy Breaches and ID Theft
- Invasion of Privacy: State Law
- Defamation: State Law
- Interference With Prospective Credit: State Law
- Interference With Marital/Family Relations: State Law
- Infliction of Emotional Distress/Mental Anguish: State Law
- Data Breach Claims and Issues
- Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Claims: State Law
- Jurisdiction, Venue, Removal to Federal Court, Remand to State Court, and Other Pre-Trial Jurisdicti
- Removal of FCRA Cases From State Court To Federal Court
- Personal Jurisdiction and Venue in Credit Reporting Cases
- FCRA Litigation Strategies and Procedural Issues and Law
- Settlements, Releases, Prevailing Party Status, and Other Things You Need to Know If You Resolve Your Case Before Judgment
- Offers of Judgment In FCRA Litigation
- Secret Documents, Product Information and Testimony
- Choicepoint Secret Documents:
- Equifax/CSC and Affiliates Secret Documents:
- Experian Secret Documents
- Innovis Secret Documents:
- Trans Union Secret Documents
- Furnisher and Public Records Suppliers Secret Documents
- Respondeat Superior, Vicarious Liability, and Whether Others Are Liable
- Liability For Employee's FCRA Violations? Liability For FCRA Violations by Third Parties?
- FCRA Preemption, Immunity, and Qualified Immunity
- FCRA Preemption: 15 U.S.C. 1681t[b][F] and Related Discussions
- FCRA Qualified Immunity: 15 U.S.C. 1681h[e] and Related Discussions
- States/Govermental Immunity From FCRA Claims?
- Jury Voir Dire, Instructions, Verdict Forms, etc.
- Jury Instructions and Jury Verdict Forms
- Jury Questionnaires, Voir Dire, Jury Selection and Jury Bias
- Credit Card Issues
- Credit Card Liabilities
- Do You Have a Right to Bring Claims and How Long Do You Have?
- Statute Of Limitation: 15 U.S.C. 1681p
- Standing to Sue
- Credit Scores, Adverse Action Codes, and Other Report Codes
- Credit Scores, Adverse Action Codes, Risk Factors, Denial Codes and Other Scores and Codes Supplied by the Credit Reporting Agencies
- The Mechanics of Credit Reporting
- Public Records Reportings [Non-Bankruptcy]
- Bankruptcy Reporting
- Student Loan Credit Reporting
- Metro Tape [I and II]: Standardized Credit Reporting Formats Used by the Credit Industry
- Defenses Asserted by Credit Reporting Defendants
- What Law Applies? Problems Barring Use of the Court and Law
- Arbitration, Forum Selection, Choice of Law, Choice of Venue and Other Adhesionary Clauses
- Conflicts of Laws Issues in FCRA and Related State Law Issues
- Standing and Statutes of Limitations
- Statute Of Limitation: 15 U.S.C. 1681p
- FCRA Legal Forms [Suits, Discovery, etc.]
- Discovery: Interrogatories, Requests For Production of Documents, Requests to Inspect, Requests For Admissions, Deposition Notices, Subpoenas, Deposit
- FCRA Sample Pleadings: Complaints, Motions, Oppositions and Other Standard Lawsuit Filings
- Defenses Frequently Asserted by Defendants to Consumer's Actions
- FCRA Class Actions and Class Issues
- FCRA Class Actions
- Special Evidentiary Issues: What is Evidence?
- Evidentiary Issues in FCRA Cases
- Expert Witnesses, Special Issues and Daubert and Related Challenges
- Appellate Issues, Rules, Law, Etc.
- Defenses Asserted by Industry and Abuse Stories
- Defense Counsel Abuses and War Stories
- Law Outlines: Various Topics
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests