Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2005 WL 1026573 (N.D.Ill.)
United States District Court,
N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
Kenneth LAMAR, Plaintiff,
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SYSTEMS, Defendant.
No. 05 C 817.
March 3, 2005.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior J.
*1 Counsel for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ("Experian," sued here as "Experian Information Systems") has filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses ("ADs") to the Complaint filed against it by Kenneth Lamar ("Lamar"), charging it with violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("Act"). [FN1] Experian's responsive pleading contains more than one of the all-too-common pleading sins that ultimately triggered this Court's inclusion of an Appendix as part of its opinion in State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Riley, 199 F.R.D. 276, 278 (N.D.Ill.2001)--an action taken in large part to eliminate the repeated need for this Court's secretary to transcribe its frequent addressing of those sins. This memorandum opinion and order is therefore issued sua sponte to require the correction of those errors.
FN1. Further citation of any provision of the Act, which is codified as part of Title 15 of the United States Code, will take the form "Section--," referring to the section numbering within Title 15 rather than to the internal section numbering of the Act.
To begin with, each of Answer ¶¶ 2, 18 and 21 impermissibly declines to respond to certain of Lamar's allegations on the ground that they assertedly contain legal conclusions. That position does not of course comply with Experian's obligations under the first sentence of Fed.R.Civ.P. ("Rule") 8(a)(see App. ¶ 2 to State Farm ). Indeed, with respect to Answer ¶ 2's nonresponse to Lamar's jurisdictional allegation, see Form 21 in the Appendix of Forms that Rule 84 expressly endorses. As to Answer ¶ 21, it is sheer nonsense for Experian to do anything other than admit Lamar's having demanded a trial by jury on all issues so triable. Answer ¶¶ 2, 18 and 21 are stricken.
Next, although Experian's counsel properly tracks the type of disclaimer that is required to get the benefit of a deemed denial under the second sentence of Rule 8(b)(see App. ¶ 1 to State Farm ), all of Answer ¶¶ 3, 7-10, 12, 13 and 17 go on to state that Experian "on that basis, denies, generally and specifically, each and every allegation in this paragraph." That locution is of course an oxymoron: If Experian does indeed lack sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of an allegation, it plainly has no basis for denying that allegation. Each of those portions of the Answer is also stricken.
Finally, virtually all of Experian's asserted ADs are problematic in terms of the standards prescribed by Rule 8(c) and the caselaw applying it--see also App. ¶ 5 to State Farm. Here are the problems:
1. AD 1, which is the essential equivalent of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, must be stricken. To the extent that it appears to challenge the absence of factual allegations, it is at odds with the notice pleading regime that applies in the federal courts, and to the extent that it fails to accept Lamar's allegations as gospel (the necessary stance for an AD), it is simply wrong.
2. AD 2 is likewise stricken because it is inconsistent with Lamar's allegation that Experian has disseminated "inaccurate information," as that term has been defined in Complaint ¶ 5 and has been repeated in numerous later allegations of the Complaint. *2 3. ADs 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 and 11 are inadequate because each of them fails to provide sufficient information to Lamar as to the basis for Experian's various contentions set out there--even under the undemanding requirements of notice pleading.
4. ADs 6 and 7 likewise require an explanation by Experian as to the basis on which it can be said that Lamar's claimed damages were a self-inflicted wound.
5. AD 8 simply cannot be understood, given the two-year statute of limitations set out in Section 1681p and the Complaint's allegations as to Experian's claimed misconduct well within that time frame. It too is stricken.
6. AD 12 essentially asks for the issuance of a blank check. If, as and when Experian may hereafter believe that any further grounds for advancement of new ADs have developed, it may seek to tender those. In the meantime, AD 12 is also stricken.
To avoid the need for reference to multiple pleadings, Experian's present Answer and ADs will be stricken in their entirety. Leave is granted to file a self-contained Amended Answer (including any ADs that may be advanced in accordance with the principles set forth here) in this Court's chambers (with a copy being transmitted contemporaneously to Lamar's counsel) on or before March 18, 2005.
No charge is to be made to Experian by its counsel for the added work and expense incurred in correcting counsel's errors. Experian's counsel is ordered to apprise his client to that effect by letter, with a copy to be transmitted to this Court's chambers as an informational matter (not for filing).
Lamar v. Experian Information Systems
Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2005 WL 1026573 (N.D.Ill.)
Defenses frequently include comparative fault, failure to mitigate, third party fault, offset, contribution, impleading a third party, laches, and many others. How do you handle these defenses? Can the defendant's witness explain facts to support the asserted defenses?
- General Discussions, Forum Registration, and ID Theft and Credit-Related News Stories
- General Discussion
- News Stories on Identity Theft, Personal Data Thefts and Credit Reporting Abuses
- Current Cases
- Lawyer Jokes
- FCRA Statute and Defined Terms Under the FCRA
- FCRA Statute And Amendments: 15 U.S.C. 1681, et. seq.
- What is a Consumer [Credit] Reporting Agency?
- What is a Consumer [Credit] Report?
- Resellers: Who are They? What Do They Do? Are They Liable Under the FCRA?
- Investigative Consumer [Credit] Reports
- Who is a Furnisher?
- How to Get Your Credit Reports and How and Who to Write Your Dispute Letters to
- How To Get Your Credit Reports
- Dispute Letters
- Do You Have To Pay For Your Credit Report?
- FCRA Private Rights of Action and Duties Imposed by the FCRA
- Impermissible Access: 15 U.S.C. 1681b[f] and 1681q
- Front End Duties of the Credit Reporting Agencies: 15 U.S.C. 1681e(b)
- Back End Duties of the CRAs: 1681i[a]:
- Credit Bureau's Duty to Provide Consumer Documentation to Furnisher: 1681i[a][B]
- Duty to Add a Consumer's Dispute Statement in Association with a Specific Account and In Connection with the Credit File/Report: 15 U.S.C. 1681i[c]
- Furnisher FCRA Liability: 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2
- Failing to Mark Contested Accounts As Disputed: 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2[a]
- Obsolescence: When Must the Credit Reportings Come Off of the Credit Report: 15 U.S.C. 1681c
- Duty to Notate Disputed Accounts As Such: 15 U.S.C. 1681c[f]
- Adverse Action Notice Rules: 15 U.S.C. 1681m and ECOA
- Credit Solicitations Are Required to be Clear and Conspicuous: 1681m[d]
- Potential Exposure For Sanctions Due to Filing Bad Faith FCRA Cases: 15 U.S.C. 1681n[c], 28 U.S.C. 1927, and Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 11
- Credit Repair Organizations Act [CROA]
- 1681g: Credit Bureaus' Duties to Provide Reports/Disclosures and to Add 100 Word Statements of the Consumer
- Affiliate Sharing Problems and Violations, 15 U.S.C. 1681s-3
- Common Credit Report Errors and Agency Misconduct
- Credit Errors
- Theft of Identity
- Mixed File Cases
- Re-Aging: Debt Collector's Efforts to Revive Obsolete Reportings
- Reinsertion of Previously Deleted Data: How and When Can It Happen?
- VIP Databases and Offline Status
- Deceased Reporting Cases
- Causation: The Crucial Link Between Breach of a Duty and Damages
- Causation to Damage [Proving Your Damages Are Related to and Caused by the Defendants
- Types of Damages, Remedies, and Awards Under the FCRA and Related State Law Claims
- Damages Under FCRA
- Punitive Damages: 15 U.S.C. 1681n
- Injunctive Relief: FCRA and State Law
- Attorneys' Fees, Litigation Expenses and Costs:
- Declaratory Relief Under the FCRA
- What is Your Potential Case Worth? Other Case Verdicts, etc.
- FCRA Jury and Bench Trial Verdicts
- Other Federal Laws Related to Credit Reporting, Data Privacy, Billing Errors and ID Theft
- FDCPA Statute And Amendments: 15 U.S.C. 1692, et. seq.
- Fair Credit Billing Act, 15 U.S.C. 1666, et. seq.
- Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998, 18 U.S.C. §1028
- Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”) and Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (“HAFA”)
- State Law Claims Related to Credit Reporting, Billing Errors, Privacy Breaches and ID Theft
- Invasion of Privacy: State Law
- Defamation: State Law
- Interference With Prospective Credit: State Law
- Interference With Marital/Family Relations: State Law
- Infliction of Emotional Distress/Mental Anguish: State Law
- Data Breach Claims and Issues
- Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Claims: State Law
- Jurisdiction, Venue, Removal to Federal Court, Remand to State Court, and Other Pre-Trial Jurisdicti
- Removal of FCRA Cases From State Court To Federal Court
- Personal Jurisdiction and Venue in Credit Reporting Cases
- FCRA Litigation Strategies and Procedural Issues and Law
- Settlements, Releases, Prevailing Party Status, and Other Things You Need to Know If You Resolve Your Case Before Judgment
- Offers of Judgment In FCRA Litigation
- Secret Documents, Product Information and Testimony
- Choicepoint Secret Documents:
- Equifax/CSC and Affiliates Secret Documents:
- Experian Secret Documents
- Innovis Secret Documents:
- Trans Union Secret Documents
- Furnisher and Public Records Suppliers Secret Documents
- Respondeat Superior, Vicarious Liability, and Whether Others Are Liable
- Liability For Employee's FCRA Violations? Liability For FCRA Violations by Third Parties?
- FCRA Preemption, Immunity, and Qualified Immunity
- FCRA Preemption: 15 U.S.C. 1681t[b][F] and Related Discussions
- FCRA Qualified Immunity: 15 U.S.C. 1681h[e] and Related Discussions
- States/Govermental Immunity From FCRA Claims?
- Jury Voir Dire, Instructions, Verdict Forms, etc.
- Jury Instructions and Jury Verdict Forms
- Jury Questionnaires, Voir Dire, Jury Selection and Jury Bias
- Credit Card Issues
- Credit Card Liabilities
- Do You Have a Right to Bring Claims and How Long Do You Have?
- Statute Of Limitation: 15 U.S.C. 1681p
- Standing to Sue
- Credit Scores, Adverse Action Codes, and Other Report Codes
- Credit Scores, Adverse Action Codes, Risk Factors, Denial Codes and Other Scores and Codes Supplied by the Credit Reporting Agencies
- The Mechanics of Credit Reporting
- Public Records Reportings [Non-Bankruptcy]
- Bankruptcy Reporting
- Student Loan Credit Reporting
- Metro Tape [I and II]: Standardized Credit Reporting Formats Used by the Credit Industry
- Defenses Asserted by Credit Reporting Defendants
- What Law Applies? Problems Barring Use of the Court and Law
- Arbitration, Forum Selection, Choice of Law, Choice of Venue and Other Adhesionary Clauses
- Conflicts of Laws Issues in FCRA and Related State Law Issues
- Standing and Statutes of Limitations
- Statute Of Limitation: 15 U.S.C. 1681p
- FCRA Legal Forms [Suits, Discovery, etc.]
- Discovery: Interrogatories, Requests For Production of Documents, Requests to Inspect, Requests For Admissions, Deposition Notices, Subpoenas, Deposit
- FCRA Sample Pleadings: Complaints, Motions, Oppositions and Other Standard Lawsuit Filings
- Defenses Frequently Asserted by Defendants to Consumer's Actions
- FCRA Class Actions and Class Issues
- FCRA Class Actions
- Special Evidentiary Issues: What is Evidence?
- Evidentiary Issues in FCRA Cases
- Expert Witnesses, Special Issues and Daubert and Related Challenges
- Appellate Issues, Rules, Law, Etc.
- Defenses Asserted by Industry and Abuse Stories
- Defense Counsel Abuses and War Stories
- Law Outlines: Various Topics
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests