Napier v. TRW/Credit Bureau Associates, Inc.,
Not Reported in A.2d, 1997 WL 819136, Del.Super., Oct 29, 1997
This 29th day of October, 1997, upon consideration of the papers filed by the parties and the record in this case, it appears to the Court that:
(1) Plaintiff Below-Appellant James D. Napier (Napier) appeals pro se [FN1] from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas granting a directed verdict to Defendant Below-Appellee TRW/Credit Bureau Associates, Inc. (CBA). For the reasons which follow, the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is AFFIRMED.
FN1. The Court has attempted to characterize Napier's assertions as recognizable legal arguments. See Jackson v. Unemployment Ins. Appeal Bd., Del.Super., C.A. No. 85A-No-9, Bifferato, J. (Sept. 24, 1986), Letter Op. at 3 (holding that the Superior Court may exhibit some degree of leniency toward a pro se litigant to ensure that his or her case is fully and fairly heard).
(2) CBA, a credit reporting agency, maintained a credit report on Napier. Napier originally filed suit in the Justice of the Peace Court. [FN2] That case was dismissed in that court for lack of jurisdiction. Napier then filed suit in the Court of Common Pleas alleging that CBA had violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). [FN3] Specifically, Napier alleged that CBA's failure to report that he had filed for bankruptcy and that the bankruptcy was later dismissed violated the FCRA. [FN4] He also alleged that CBA was required to place a one hundred word statement prepared by Napier in his credit report explaining any disputes pertaining the credit report. [FN5] CBA's failure to include such a statement, Napier contended, also violated the FCRA. Finally, Napier claimed that CBA was required to remove reference to a tax lien from his credit report. [FN6] He sought $15,000 in punitive damages.
FN2. It is not clear from the record what remedies Napier was seeking in the Justice of the Peace Court.
FN3. 15 U.S.C. § 1681.
FN4. Ct. Comm. Pleas Compl. ¶ 3a.
FN5. Id. ¶ 3c.
FN6. Id. ¶ 3d.
(3) A non-jury trial was held in the Court of Common Pleas on April 9, 1997. At the close of Napier's case, CBA moved for directed verdict pursuant to Court of Common Pleas Rule 50(a). [FN7] CBA then argued that: (1) it was not required to have reported the bankruptcy and therefore, it had no obligation to report that Napier's bankruptcy had been dismissed; (2) because Napier had not submitted a one hundred word statement disputing the tax lien but rather a one hundred word statement concerning CBA's failure to note Napier's bankruptcy and its later dismissal, CBA did not violate the FCRA; and (3) since Napier did not dispute that the tax lien was a matter of public record, the credit report was therefore accurate. [FN8] The Court of Common Pleas granted that motion and entered a judgment in favor of CBA, from which decision Napier appeals. [FN9]
FN7. Tr. at 22.
FN8. Id. at 18-20.
FN9. Id; 10 Del. C. § 1318; Super. Ct. Civ. R. 72(a).
(4) In this appeal, Napier contends that: (1) the FCRA requires CBA to report the dismissal of his bankruptcy; (2) CBA is required to remove reference to the IRS tax lien from his credit report; and (3) CBA unlawfully allowed certain credit companies to "solicit" his records in violation of the FCRA. This latter issue was not presented to the trial court.
(5) When sitting as an intermediate court of appeals, the Superior Court functions the same as the Supreme Court. [FN10] The standard of review in an appeal from a trial court's ruling upon a motion for directed verdict is whether the evidence and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom, taken in a light most favorable to the non-moving party, raise an issue of material fact for consideration by the trier of fact. [FN11] It is the plaintiff's burden, however, to establish a prima facie basis for recovery as to all elements of his claim. [FN12] That burden requires a significant evidentiary showing. [FN13] The existence of a mere scintilla of evidence in favor of the non-moving party is insufficient to support the verdict; the question is not whether there is literally no evidence supporting the party against whom the motion is directed, but whether there is evidence upon which the trier of fact could properly find a verdict for that party. [FN14] In addition, issues not raised in the trial court shall not be heard on appeal. [FN15]
FN10. Baker v. Connell, Del.Supr., 488 A.2d 1303, 1309 (1985); State v. Beles, Del.Super., Cr.A. No. 96-06-0468, Graves, J. (March 13, 1997) (Mem.Op.) (holding that the Superior Court when sitting as a court of appeal functions the same as the Supreme Court); State v. Arterbridge, Del.Super., Cr.A. No. 94-08-0845, Barron, J. (December 7, 1995) (Mem.Op.) (same).
FN11. Russell v. Kanaga, Del.Supr., 571 A.2d 724, 731 (1990).
FN12. Freedman v. Chrysler Corp., Del.Supr., 564 A.2d 691, 695 (1989).
FN15. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Conner, Del.Supr., 415 A.2d 773, 781 (1980); Wilmington Mem. Co. v. Silverbrook Cemetery Co., Del.Supr., 297 A.2d 378, 380 (1972).
(6) Pursuant to the Federal Trade Commission's commentary on the FCRA, "[c]onsumer reporting agencies are not required to include all existing derogatory or favorable information about a consumer in their reports." [FN16] Furthermore, if a reported bankruptcy has been dismissed, that fact should be reported." [FN17] At no time did CBA report that Napier filed for bankruptcy. Therefore, under the FCRA, CBA was not required to report that the bankruptcy had been dismissed. Such was the correct finding of the trial court. [FN18]
FN16. FTC Fair Credit Reporting Act, 16 C.F.R. § 600 (1990).
FN18. Tr. at 29.
(7) CBA was not required to remove the IRS tax lien from Napier's credit report. Napier does not dispute that a federal tax lien is on public record against him in Chester County, Pennsylvania. [FN19] Napier does, however, dispute the validity of the tax lien. [FN20] Where a consumer disputes a particular credit item appearing on his report, the consumer may submit a statement setting forth his version of the dispute to be enclosed in the credit report. [FN21] Thus CBA was not required to remove the tax lien from Napier's credit report. [FN22] Rather, CBA was obligated to allow Napier to place a statement on the report noting the dispute, and did so. [FN23]
FN19. Stipulation of Facts ¶ 4.
FN20. Id. at 9.
FN21. Williams v. Colonial Bank, M.D. Ala., 826 F.Supp. 415, 418 (1993), aff'd, 11th Cir., 29 F.3d 641 (1994).
(8) Napier also raises a new issue in this appeal. He claims that CBA unlawfully allowed certain credit companies to solicit information from them about his credit report. As these issues were not raised in the trial court, they may not now considered on appeal . [FN24]
FN24. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Conner, Del.Supr., 415 A.2d 773, 781 (1980); Wilmington Mem. Co. v. Silverbrook Cemetery Co., Del.Supr., 297 A.2d 378, 380 (1972).
(9) The Court finds that the evidence and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom, taken in a light most favorable to the non-moving party, did not raise an issue of material fact before the trial court, and that the trial court correctly granted a directed verdict in CBA's favor. Thus the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Information that should and should not be reported where there is a bankruptcy.
- General Discussions, Forum Registration, and ID Theft and Credit-Related News Stories
- General Discussion
- News Stories on Identity Theft, Personal Data Thefts and Credit Reporting Abuses
- Current Cases
- Lawyer Jokes
- FCRA Statute and Defined Terms Under the FCRA
- FCRA Statute And Amendments: 15 U.S.C. 1681, et. seq.
- What is a Consumer [Credit] Reporting Agency?
- What is a Consumer [Credit] Report?
- Resellers: Who are They? What Do They Do? Are They Liable Under the FCRA?
- Investigative Consumer [Credit] Reports
- Who is a Furnisher?
- How to Get Your Credit Reports and How and Who to Write Your Dispute Letters to
- How To Get Your Credit Reports
- Dispute Letters
- Do You Have To Pay For Your Credit Report?
- FCRA Private Rights of Action and Duties Imposed by the FCRA
- Impermissible Access: 15 U.S.C. 1681b[f] and 1681q
- Front End Duties of the Credit Reporting Agencies: 15 U.S.C. 1681e(b)
- Back End Duties of the CRAs: 1681i[a]:
- Credit Bureau's Duty to Provide Consumer Documentation to Furnisher: 1681i[a][B]
- Duty to Add a Consumer's Dispute Statement in Association with a Specific Account and In Connection with the Credit File/Report: 15 U.S.C. 1681i[c]
- Furnisher FCRA Liability: 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2
- Failing to Mark Contested Accounts As Disputed: 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2[a]
- Obsolescence: When Must the Credit Reportings Come Off of the Credit Report: 15 U.S.C. 1681c
- Duty to Notate Disputed Accounts As Such: 15 U.S.C. 1681c[f]
- Adverse Action Notice Rules: 15 U.S.C. 1681m and ECOA
- Credit Solicitations Are Required to be Clear and Conspicuous: 1681m[d]
- Potential Exposure For Sanctions Due to Filing Bad Faith FCRA Cases: 15 U.S.C. 1681n[c], 28 U.S.C. 1927, and Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 11
- Credit Repair Organizations Act [CROA]
- 1681g: Credit Bureaus' Duties to Provide Reports/Disclosures and to Add 100 Word Statements of the Consumer
- Affiliate Sharing Problems and Violations, 15 U.S.C. 1681s-3
- Common Credit Report Errors and Agency Misconduct
- Credit Errors
- Theft of Identity
- Mixed File Cases
- Re-Aging: Debt Collector's Efforts to Revive Obsolete Reportings
- Reinsertion of Previously Deleted Data: How and When Can It Happen?
- VIP Databases and Offline Status
- Deceased Reporting Cases
- Causation: The Crucial Link Between Breach of a Duty and Damages
- Causation to Damage [Proving Your Damages Are Related to and Caused by the Defendants
- Types of Damages, Remedies, and Awards Under the FCRA and Related State Law Claims
- Damages Under FCRA
- Punitive Damages: 15 U.S.C. 1681n
- Injunctive Relief: FCRA and State Law
- Attorneys' Fees, Litigation Expenses and Costs:
- Declaratory Relief Under the FCRA
- What is Your Potential Case Worth? Other Case Verdicts, etc.
- FCRA Jury and Bench Trial Verdicts
- Other Federal Laws Related to Credit Reporting, Data Privacy, Billing Errors and ID Theft
- FDCPA Statute And Amendments: 15 U.S.C. 1692, et. seq.
- Fair Credit Billing Act, 15 U.S.C. 1666, et. seq.
- Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998, 18 U.S.C. §1028
- Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”) and Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (“HAFA”)
- State Law Claims Related to Credit Reporting, Billing Errors, Privacy Breaches and ID Theft
- Invasion of Privacy: State Law
- Defamation: State Law
- Interference With Prospective Credit: State Law
- Interference With Marital/Family Relations: State Law
- Infliction of Emotional Distress/Mental Anguish: State Law
- Data Breach Claims and Issues
- Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Claims: State Law
- Jurisdiction, Venue, Removal to Federal Court, Remand to State Court, and Other Pre-Trial Jurisdicti
- Removal of FCRA Cases From State Court To Federal Court
- Personal Jurisdiction and Venue in Credit Reporting Cases
- FCRA Litigation Strategies and Procedural Issues and Law
- Settlements, Releases, Prevailing Party Status, and Other Things You Need to Know If You Resolve Your Case Before Judgment
- Offers of Judgment In FCRA Litigation
- Secret Documents, Product Information and Testimony
- Choicepoint Secret Documents:
- Equifax/CSC and Affiliates Secret Documents:
- Experian Secret Documents
- Innovis Secret Documents:
- Trans Union Secret Documents
- Furnisher and Public Records Suppliers Secret Documents
- Respondeat Superior, Vicarious Liability, and Whether Others Are Liable
- Liability For Employee's FCRA Violations? Liability For FCRA Violations by Third Parties?
- FCRA Preemption, Immunity, and Qualified Immunity
- FCRA Preemption: 15 U.S.C. 1681t[b][F] and Related Discussions
- FCRA Qualified Immunity: 15 U.S.C. 1681h[e] and Related Discussions
- States/Govermental Immunity From FCRA Claims?
- Jury Voir Dire, Instructions, Verdict Forms, etc.
- Jury Instructions and Jury Verdict Forms
- Jury Questionnaires, Voir Dire, Jury Selection and Jury Bias
- Credit Card Issues
- Credit Card Liabilities
- Do You Have a Right to Bring Claims and How Long Do You Have?
- Statute Of Limitation: 15 U.S.C. 1681p
- Standing to Sue
- Credit Scores, Adverse Action Codes, and Other Report Codes
- Credit Scores, Adverse Action Codes, Risk Factors, Denial Codes and Other Scores and Codes Supplied by the Credit Reporting Agencies
- The Mechanics of Credit Reporting
- Public Records Reportings [Non-Bankruptcy]
- Bankruptcy Reporting
- Student Loan Credit Reporting
- Metro Tape [I and II]: Standardized Credit Reporting Formats Used by the Credit Industry
- Defenses Asserted by Credit Reporting Defendants
- What Law Applies? Problems Barring Use of the Court and Law
- Arbitration, Forum Selection, Choice of Law, Choice of Venue and Other Adhesionary Clauses
- Conflicts of Laws Issues in FCRA and Related State Law Issues
- Standing and Statutes of Limitations
- Statute Of Limitation: 15 U.S.C. 1681p
- FCRA Legal Forms [Suits, Discovery, etc.]
- Discovery: Interrogatories, Requests For Production of Documents, Requests to Inspect, Requests For Admissions, Deposition Notices, Subpoenas, Deposit
- FCRA Sample Pleadings: Complaints, Motions, Oppositions and Other Standard Lawsuit Filings
- Defenses Frequently Asserted by Defendants to Consumer's Actions
- FCRA Class Actions and Class Issues
- FCRA Class Actions
- Special Evidentiary Issues: What is Evidence?
- Evidentiary Issues in FCRA Cases
- Expert Witnesses, Special Issues and Daubert and Related Challenges
- Appellate Issues, Rules, Law, Etc.
- Defenses Asserted by Industry and Abuse Stories
- Defense Counsel Abuses and War Stories
- Law Outlines: Various Topics
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests