Wisconsin law: Anderson v. Trans Union

David A. Szwak

Wisconsin law: Anderson v. Trans Union

Postby David A. Szwak » Sun Dec 25, 2005 9:13 pm

Anderson v. Trans Union, LLC
345 F.Supp.2d 963
Nov 24, 2004

Plaintiffs seem to be bringing their "tortious interference with credit (economic) expectancy" as a cause of action known in Wisconsin as "interference with prospective economic relations." Defendant CSC contends that plaintiffs have no evidence that defendant ever acted with the purpose of interfering with an prospective contract. Plaintiffs have not responded to defendant's arguments. I interpret this lack of response as a decision to abandon the claim. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Midwest Motor Express, 181 F.3d 799, 808 (7th Cir.1999) (arguments not developed are deemed waived).

Return to “Interference With Prospective Credit: State Law”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests