Preponderance of the Evidence;Substantial Factor

Proving the proximate and legal cause of your damages may be more tricky than you think.
David A. Szwak

Preponderance of the Evidence;Substantial Factor

Postby David A. Szwak » Tue Nov 29, 2005 3:50 pm

One of the most difficult hurdles for a consumer is proving causation. In order to recover greater than nominal compensatory damages, Plaintiff must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that damages were incurred. See Roemer v. Retail Credit Co., 44 Cal.App.3d 926, 119 Cal.Rptr. 82. One type of damage, credit denials, present a special causation problem. Plaintiff must show that the credit denial was caused by inaccurate data appearing in plaintiff's report issued by the agency. Further, plaintiff must tie the inaccuracies of the credit report to the consumer reporting agency's failure to employ "reasonable procedures" or other FCRA violations. 15 U.S.C. 1681e(b); Pendleton v. Trans Union Systems Corp., 76 F.R.D. 192 (U.S.D.C. E.D. Pa.); Cahlin v. GMAC, 936 F.2d 1151 (11th Cir. 1991).

Return to “Causation to Damage [Proving Your Damages Are Related to and Caused by the Defendants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest