Edeh v. Equifax Information Services, USDC Minn.

Site Admin
Posts: 11757
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 4:15 am

Edeh v. Equifax Information Services, USDC Minn.

Postby Administrator » Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:23 pm

1. Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and a preliminary or permanent injunction (ECF No. 5) should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

a. To the extent Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, the motion should be DENIED. The Fair Credit Reporting Act does not allow consumers to seek injunctive relief. See Washington v. CSC Credit Servs. Inc., 199 F.3d 263, 268 (5th Cir.2000). And Plaintiff has not established the requisite public benefit to seek injunctive relief under Minnesota's private-attorney-general statute. See Ly v. Nystrom, 615 N.W.2d 302, 314 (Minn.2000).

Edeh v. Equifax Information Services
Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2012 WL 6923800
October 11, 2012
David A. Szwak
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak, LLC
416 Travis Street, Suite 1404, Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-424-1400 / Fax 221-6555
President, Bossier Little League
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association

Return to “Injunctive Relief: FCRA and State Law”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests