Mann v. Wells Fargo Bank, ND Calif.

Site Admin
Posts: 11757
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 4:15 am

Mann v. Wells Fargo Bank, ND Calif.

Postby Administrator » Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:30 pm

C. Plaintiffs' Claim for Injunctive Relief
Finally, Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs' seventh cause of action for injunctive relief. Injunctive relief is not an independent cause of action, but is a form of relief. Logvinov v. Wells Fargo Bank, No. 11–04772 DMR, 2011 WL 6140995, at *4 (N.D.Cal. Dec.9, 2011); Mehta v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 737 F.Supp.2d 1185, 1205 (S.D.Cal.2010) (“Injunctive relief, like damages, is a remedy requested by the parties, not a separate cause of action .”) (citation and quotation marks omitted); Hamilton v. Bank of Blue Valley, 746 F.Supp.2d 1160, 1182 (E.D.Cal.2010) (“Injunctive relief is a remedy and not, in itself, a cause of action, and a cause of action must exist before injunctive relief may be granted.”) (citation and quotation marks omitted). Plaintiffs may seek injunctive relief in their Prayer for Relief. Defendants' motion to dismiss this type of relief as a separate claim is granted. This is without prejudice to granting injunctive relief should such relief be available and appropriate upon the success of any claim.

Mann v. Wells Fargo Bank
Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2012 WL 3727369
August 27, 2012
David A. Szwak
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak, LLC
416 Travis Street, Suite 1404, Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-424-1400 / Fax 221-6555
President, Bossier Little League
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association

Return to “Injunctive Relief: FCRA and State Law”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests