Emo v. Milbank Mutual Insurance

Post Reply
David A. Szwak
Posts: 4126
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 4:15 am

Emo v. Milbank Mutual Insurance

Post by David A. Szwak »

Emo v. Milbank Mut. Ins. Co.
183 N.W.2d 508
N.D. 1971.

Unquestionably, publication to one's spouse of defamatory matter is sufficient to give rise to a cause of action for libel or slander. Bonkowski v. Arlan's Department Store, 12 Mich.App. 88, 162 N.W.2d 347 (1968), 383 Mich. 90, 174 N.W.2d 765 (1970); Linck v. Driscoll, 13 Ind.App. 279, 41 N.E. 463 (1895); Prosser, Torts 3rd Ed. HB (1964), p. 804. The Michigan Supreme Court, in Bonkowski v. Arlan's Department Store, Supra 174 N.W.2d at 767, said:
[bb8]'We may fairly presume that, in the uneven course of marital life, the humiliation suffered by a plaintiff in like circumstances is more likely to be recalled--and brooded over--than if the event in question had occurred in the presence of strangers then and strangers forever.'[/bb8][/u
Post Reply

Return to “Interference With Marital/Family Relations: State Law”